CHAPTER XXI.
TEXTS EXPLAINED; SIXTHLY, PROVERBS
viii. 22, CONTINUED.
Our Lord not said in Scripture to be 'created,' or the works to
be 'begotten.'
'In the beginning' means in the case of the works 'from the beginning.'
Scripture passages explained. We are made by God first, begotten
next;
creatures by nature, sons by grace. Christ begotten first, made
or created
afterwards. Sense of 'First-born of the dead;' of 'First-born among
many
brethren;' of 'First-born of all creation,' contrasted with 'Only-begotten.'
Further interpretation of 'beginning of ways,' and 'for the works.'
Why a
creature could not redeem; why redemption was necessary at all.
Texts which
contrast the Word and the works.
57. FOR had He been a creature, He had not said, 'He begets me,'
for the
creatures are from without, and are works of the Maker; but the
Offspring is
not from without nor a work, but from the Father, and proper to
His Essence.
Wherefore they are creatures; this God's Word and Only-begotten
Son. For
instance, Moses did not say of the creation, 'In the beginning He
begat,' nor
'In the beginning was,' but 'In the beginning God created the heaven
and the
earth(1).' Nor did David say in the Psalm, 'Thy hands have "begotten
me,"' but
'made me and fashioned me(2),' everywhere applying the word 'made'
to the
creatures. But to the Son contrariwise; for he has not said 'I made,'
but 'I
begat(3),' and 'He begets me,' and 'My heart uttered a good Word(4).'
And in
the instance of the creation, 'In the beginning He made;' but in
the instance
of the Son, 'In the beginning was the Word(5).' And there is this
difference,
that the creatures are made upon the beginning, and have a beginning
of
existence connected with an interval; wherefore also what is said
of them, 'In
the beginning He made,' is as much as saying of them, 'From the
beginning He
made:'--as the Lord, knowing that which He had made, taught, when
He silenced
the Pharisees, with the words, 'He which made them from the beginning,
made
them male and female(6);' for from some beginning, when they were
not yet,
were originate things brought into being and created. This too the
Holy Spirit
has signified in the Psalms, saying, 'Thou, Lord, at the beginning
hast laid
the foundation of the earth(7);' and again, 'O think upon Thy congregation
which Thou hast purchased from the beginning(8);' now it is plain
that what
takes place at the beginning, has a beginning of creation, and that
from some
beginning God purchased His congregation. And that In the beginning
He made,'
from his saying made,' means 'began to make,' Moses himself shews
by saying,
after the completion of all things, 'And God blessed the seventh
day and
sanctified it, because that in it He had rested from all His work
which God
began to make(9).' Therefore the creatures began to be made; but
the Word of
God, not having beginning of being, certainly did not begin to be,
nor begin
to come to be, but was ever. And the works have their beginning
in their
making, and their beginning precedes their coming to be; but the
Word, not
being of things which come to be, rather comes to be Himself the
Framer of
those which have a beginning. And the being of things originate
is measured by
their becoming(10), and from some beginning does God begin to make
them
through the Word, that it may be known that they were not before
their
origination; but the Word has His being, in no other beginning(11)
than the
Father, whom(12) they allow to be without beginning, so that He
too exists
without beginning m the Father, being His Offspring, not His creature.
380
58. Thus does divine Scripture recognise the difference between
the
Offspring and things made, and shew that the Offspring is a Son,
not begun
from any beginning, but eternal; but that the thing made, as an
external work
of the Maker, began to come into being. John therefore delivering
divine
doctrine(1) about the Son, and knowing the difference of the phrases,
said
not, 'In the beginning has become' or 'been made,' but 'In the beginning
was
the Word;' that we might understand 'Offspring' by 'was,' and not
account of
Him by intervals, but believe the Son always and eternally to exist.
And with
these proofs, how, O Arians, misunderstanding the passage in Deuteronomy,
did
you venture a fresh act of irreligion(2) against the Lord, saying
that 'He is
a work,' or 'creature,' or indeed 'offspring?' for offspring and
work you take
to mean the same thing; but here too you shall be shewn to be as
unlearned as
you are irreligious. Your first passage is this, 'Is not He thy
Father that
bought thee? did He not make thee and create thee(3)? And shortly
after in the
same Song he says, 'God that begat thee thou didst desert, and forgattest
God
that nourished thee(4).' Now the meaning conveyed in these passages
is very
remarkable; for he says not first 'He begat,' lest that term should
be taken
as indiscriminate with 'He made,' and these men should have a pretence
for
saying, 'Moses tells us indeed that God said from the beginning,
"Let Us make
man(5)," but he soon after says himself, 'God that begat thee
thou didst
desert,' as if the terms were indifferent; for offspring and work
are the
same. But after the words 'bought' and 'made,' he has added last
of all
'begat,' that the sentence might carry its own interpretation; for
in the word
'made' he accurately denotes what belongs to men by nature, to be
works and
things made; but in the word 'begat' he shews God's lovingkindness
exercised
towards men after He had created them. And since they have proved
ungrateful
upon this, thereupon Moses reproaches them, saying first, 'Do ye
thus requite
the Lord?' and then adds, 'Is not He thy Father that bought thee?
Did He not
make thee and create thee(6)?' And next he says, 'They sacrificed
unto devils,
not to God, to gods whom they knew not. New gods and strange came
up, whom
your fathers knew not; the God that begat thee thou didst desert
(7). '
59. For God not only created them to be men, but called them to
be sons,
as having begotten them. For the term 'begat' is here as elsewhere
expressive
of a Son, as He says by the Prophet, 'I begat sons and exalted them;'
and
generally, when Scripture wishes to signify a son, it does so, not
by the term
'created,' but undoubtedly by that of 'begat.' And this John seems
to say, 'He
gave to them power to become children of God, even to them that
believe on His
Name; which were begotten not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh,
nor of
the will of man, but of God(1).' And here too the cautious distinction(2)
is
well kept up, for first he says 'become,' because they are not called
sons by
nature but by adoption; then he says 'were begotten,' because they
too had
received at any rate the name of son. But the People, as says the
Prophet,
'despised' their Benefactor. But this is God's kindness to man,
that of whom
He is Maker, of them according to grace He afterwards becomes Father
also;
becomes, that is, when men, His creatures, receive into their hearts,
as the
Apostle says, 'the Spirit of His Son, crying, Abba, Father(3).'
And these are
they who, having received the Word, gained power from Him to become
sons of
God; for they could not become sons, being by nature creatures,
otherwise than
by receiving the Spirit of the natural and true Son. Wherefore,
that this
might be, 'The Word became flesh,' that He might make man capable
of Godhead.
This same meaning may be gained also from the Prophet Malachi, who
says, 'Hath
not One God created us? Have we not all one Father(4)?' for first
he puts
'created,' next 'Father,' to shew, as the other writers, that from
the
beginning we were creatures by nature, and God is our Creator through
the
Word; but afterwards we were made sons, and thenceforward God the
Creator
becomes our Father also. Therefore 'Father' is proper to the Son;
and not
'creature,' but 'Son' is proper to the Father. Accordingly this
passage also
proves, that we are not sons by nature, but the Son who is in us(5);
and
again, that God is not our Father by nature, but of that Word in
us, in whom
and because of whom we 'cry, Abba, Father(6).' And so in like manner,
the
Father calls them sons in whomsoever He sees His own Son, and says,
'I begat;'
since begetting is significant of a Son, and making is indicative
of the
works. And thus it is that we are not
381
begotten first, but made; for it is written, 'Let Us make man(7);'
but
afterwards, on receiving the grace of the Spirit, we are said thenceforth
to
be begotten also; just as the great Moses in his Song with an apposite
meaning
says first 'He bought,' and afterwards 'He begat;' lest, hearing
'He begat,'
they might forget their own original nature; but that they might
know that
from the beginning they are creatures, but when according to grace
they are
said to be begotten, as sons, still no less than before are men
works
according to nature.
60. And that creature and offspring are not the same, but differ
from each
other in nature and the signification of the words, the Lord Himself
shews
even in the Proverbs. For having said, 'The Lord treated me a beginning
of His
ways;' He has added, 'But before all the hills He begat me.' If
then the Word
were by nature and in His Essence(1) a creature, and there were
no difference
between offspring and creature, He would not have added, 'He begat
me,' but
had been satisfied with 'He created,' as if that term implied the
begat;' but,
as it is, after saying, 'He created me a beginning of His ways for
His works,'
He has added, not simply 'begat me,' but with the connection of
the
conjunction 'But,' as guarding thereby the term 'created,' when
he says, 'But
before all the hills He begat me.' For 'begat me' succeeding in
such close
connection to 'created me,' makes the meaning one, and shews that
'created' is
said with an object(2), but that 'begat me' is prior to 'treated
me.' For as,
if He had said the reverse, 'The Lord begat me,' and went on, 'But
before the
hills He created me,' 'created' would certainly precede 'begat,'
so having
said first 'created,' and then added 'But before all the hills He
begat me,'
He necessarily shews that 'begat preceded 'created.' For in saying,
'Before
all lie begat me,' He intimates that He is other than all things;
it having
been shewn to be trues in an earlier part of this book, that no
one creature
was made before another, but all things originate subsisted at once
together
upon one and the same command(4). Therefore neither do the words
which follow
'created,' also follow 'begat me;' but in the case of 'created'
is added
'beginning of ways,' but of 'begat me,' He says not, 'He begat me
as a
beginning,' but 'before all He begat me.' But He who is before all
is not a
beginning of all, but is other than all(5); but if other than all
(in which
'all' the beginning of all is included), it follows that He is other
than the
creatures; and it becomes a clear point, that the Word, being other
than all
things and before all, afterwards is created 'a beginning of the
ways for
works,' because He became man, that, as the Apostle has said, He
who is the
'Beginning' and 'First-born from the dead, in all things might have
the
preeminence(6).'
61. Such then being the difference between 'created' and 'begat
me,' and
between 'beginning of ways' and 'before all,' God, being first Creator,
next,
as has been said, becomes Father of men, because of His Word dwelling
in them.
But in the case of the Word the reverse; for God, being His Father
by nature,
becomes afterwards both His Creator and Maker, when the Word puts
on that
flesh which was created and made, and becomes man. For, as men,
receiving the
Spirit of the Son, become children through Him, so the Word of God,
when He
Himself puts on the flesh of man, then is said both to be created
and to have
been made. If then we are by nature sons, then is He by nature creature
and
work; but if we become sons by adoption and grace, then has the
Word also,
when in grace towards us He became man, said, 'The Lord created
me.' And in
the next place, when He put on a created nature and became like
us in body,
reasonably was He therefore called both our Brother and 'First-born(1).'
For
though it was after us(2) that He was made man for us, and our brother
by
similitude of body, still He is therefore called and is the 'First-born'
of
us, because, all men being lost, according to the transgression
of Adam, His
flesh before all others was saved and liberated, as being the Word's
body(3);
and henceforth we, becoming incorporate with It, are saved after
Its pattern.
For in It the Lord becomes our guide to the Kingdom of Heaven and
to His own
Father, saying, 'I am the way' and 'the door(4),' and through Me
all must
enter.' Whence also is He said to be 'First-born from the dead(5),'
not that
He died before us, for we had died first; but because having undergone
death
for us and abolished it, He was the first to rise, as man, for our
sakes
raising His own Body. Henceforth He having risen, we too from Him
and because
of Him rise in due course from the dead.
382
62. But if He is also called 'First-born of the creation(1),'
still this
is not as if He were levelled to the creatures, and only first of
them in
point of time (for how should that be, since He is 'Only-begotten?'),
but it
is because of the Word's condescension(2) to the creatures, according
to which
He has become the 'Brother' of 'many.' For the term 'Only-begotten'
is used
where there are no brethren, but 'First-born(3)' because of brethren.
Accordingly it is nowhere written in the Scriptures, 'the first-born
of God,'
nor 'the creature of God;' but 'Only-begotten' and 'Son' and 'Word'
and
'Wisdom,' refer to Him as proper to the Father(4). Thus, 'We have
seen His
glory, the glory as of the Only-be-gotten of the Father(5);' and
'God sent His
Only-begotten Son(6);' and 'O Lord, Thy Word endureth for ever(7);'
and 'In
the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God;' and 'Christ
the Power
of God and the Wisdom of God(8);' and 'This is My beloved Son;'
and 'Thou art
the Christ, the Son of the Living God(9).' But ' first-born' implied
the
descent to the creation(10); for of it has He been called first-born;
and 'He
created' implies His grace towards the works, for for them is He
created. If
then He is Only-begotten, as indeed He is, 'First-born' needs some
explanation; but if He be really First-born, then He is not Only-begotten(10).
For the same cannot be both Only-begotten and First-born, except
in different
relations; -that is, Only-begotten, because of His generation from
the Father,
as has been said; and First-born, because of His condescension to
the creation
and His making the many His brethren. Certainly, those two terms
being
inconsistent with each other, one should say that the attribute
of being
Only-begot-ten has justly the preference in the instance of the
Word, in that
there is no other Word, or other Wisdom, but He alone is very Son
of the
Father. Moreover(11), as was before(12) said, not in connection
with any
reason, but absolutely(13) it is said of Him, 'The Only-begotten
Son which is
in the bosom of the Father(14);' but the word 'First-born' has again
the
creation as a reason in connection with it, which Paul proceeds
to say, 'for
in Him all things were created(15).' But if all the creatures were
created in
Him, He is other than the creatures, and is not a creature, but
the Creator of
the creatures.
63. Not then because He was from the Father was He called 'First-born,'
but because in Him the creation came to be; and as before the creation
He was
the Son, through whom was the creation, so also before He was called
the
First-born of the whole creation, not the less was the Word Himself
with God
and the Word was God. But this also not understanding, these irreligious
men
go about saying, 'If He is First-born of all creation, it is plain
that He too
is one of the creation.' Senseless men! if He is simply 'First-born(1)
of the
whole creation,' then He is other than the whole creation; for he
says not,
'He is First-born above the rest of the creatures,' lest He be reckoned
to be
as one of the creatures, but it is written, 'of the whole creation,'
that He
may appear other than the creation(2). Reuben, for instance, is
not said to be
first-born of all the children of Jacob(3), but of Jacob himself
and his
brethren; lest he should be thought to be some other beside the
children of
Jacob. Nay, even concerning the Lord Himself the Apostle says not,
'that He
may become First-born of
383
all,' lest He be thought to bear a body other than ours, but 'among
many
brethren(4),' because of the likeness of the flesh. If then the
Word also were
one of the creatures, Scripture would have said of Him also that
He was
First-born of other creatures; but in fact, the saints saying that
He is
'First-born of the whole creation(5),' the Son of God is plainly
shewn to be
other than the whole creation and not a creature. For if He is a
creature, He
will be First-born of Himself. How then is it possible, O Arians,
for Him to
be before and after Himself? next, if He is a creature, and the
whole creation
through Him came to be, and in Him consists, how can He both create
the
creation and be one of the things which consist in Him? Since then
such a
notion is in itself unseemly, it is proved against them by the truth,
that He
is called 'First-born among many brethren' because of the relationship
of the
flesh, and 'First-born from the dead,' because the resurrection
of the dead is
from Him and after Him; and 'First-born of the whole creation,'
because of the
Father's love to man, which brought it to pass that in His Word
not, only 'all
things consist(6),' but the creation itself, of which the Apostle
speaks,
'waiting for the manifestation of the sons of God, shall be delivered'
one
time 'from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of
the children
of God(7).' Of this creation thus delivered, the Lord will be First-born,
both
of it and of all those who are made children, that by His being
called first,
those that come after Him may abide(8), as depending on the Word
as a
beginning(9).
64. And I think that the irreligious men themselves will be shamed
from
such a thought; for if the case stands not as we have said, but
they will rule
it that He is 'First-born of the whole creation' as in essence--a
creature
among creatures, let them reflect that they will be conceiving Him
as brother
and fellow of the things without reason and life. For of the whole
creation
these also are parts; and the 'First-born' must be first indeed
in point of
time but only thus, and in kind and similitude(1) must be the same
with all.
How then can they say this without exceeding all measures of irreligion?
or
who will endure them, if this is their language? or who can but
hate them even
imagining such things? For it is evident to all, that neither for
Himself, as
being a creature, nor as having any connection according to essence
with the
whole creation, has He been called 'First-born' of it: but because
the Word,
when at the beginning He framed the creatures, condescended to things
originate, that it might be possible for them to come to be. For
they could
not have endured His nature, which was untempered splendour, even
that of the
Father, unless condescending by the Father's love for man He had
supported
them and taken hold of them and brought them into existence(2);
and next,
because, by this condescension of the Word, the creation too is
made a sons
through Him, that He might be in all respects 'First-born' of it,
as has been
said, both in creating, and also in being brought for the sake of
all into
this very world. For so it is written, 'When He bringeth the First-born
into
the world, He saith, Let all the Angels of God worship Him(4).'
Let Christ's
enemies hear and tear themselves to pieces, because His coming into
the world
is what makes Him called 'First-born' of all; and thus the Son is
the Father's
'Only-begotten,' because He alone is from Him, and He is the 'First-born
of
creations,' because of this adoption of all as sons(5). And as He
is
First-born among brethren and rose from the dead 'the first fruits
of them
that slept(6);' so, since it became Him 'in all things to have the
preeminence(7),' therefore He is created 'a beginning of ways,'
that we,
walking along it and entering through Him who says, 'I am the Way'
and 'the
Door,' and partaking of the knowledge of the Father, may also hear
the words,
'Blessed are the undefiled in the Way,' and 'Blessed are the pure
in heart,
for they shall see God(8).'
65. And thus since the truth declares that the Word is not by
nature a
creature, it is fitting now to say, in what sense He is 'beginning
of
384
ways.' For when the first way, which was through Adam, was lost,
and in place
of paradise we deviated unto death, and heard the words, 'Dust thou
art, and
unto dust(1) shall thou return,' therefore the Word of God, who
loves man,
puts on Him created flesh at the Father's will(2), that whereas
the first man
had made it dead through the transgression, He Himself might quicken
it in the
blood of His own body(3), and might open 'for us a way new and living,'
as the
Apostle says, 'through the veil, that is to say, His flesh(4);'
which he
signifies elsewhere thus, 'Wherefore, if any man be in Christ, he
is a new
creation; old things are passed away, behold all things are become
new(5).'
But if a new creation has come to pass, some one must be first of
this
creation; now a man, made of earth only, such as we are become from
the
transgression, he could not be. For in the first creation, men had
become
unfaithful, and through them that first creation had been lost;
and there was
need of some one else to renew the first creation, and preserve
the new which
had come to be. Therefore from love to man none other than the Lord,
the
'beginning' of the new creation, is created as 'the Way,' and consistently
says,' The Lord created me a beginning of ways for His works;' that
man might
walk no longer according to that first creation, but there being
as it were a
beginning of a new creation, and with the Christ 'a beginning of
its ways,' we
might follow Him henceforth, who says to us,' I am the Way:'--as
the blessed
Apostle teaches in Colossians, saying, 'He is the Head of the body,
the
Church, who is the Beginning, the First-born from the dead, that
in all things
He might have the preeminence.'
66. For if, as has been said, because of the resurrection from
the dead He
is called a beginning, and then a resurrection took place when He,
bearing our
flesh, had given Himself to death for us, it is evident that His
words, 'He
created me a beginning of ways,' is indicative not of His essence(6),
but of
His bodily presence. For to the body death was proper(7); and in
like manner
to the bodily presence are the words proper, 'The Lord created me
a beginning
of His ways.' For since the Saviour was thus created according to
the flesh,
and had become a beginning of things new created, and had our first
fruits,
viz. that human flesh which He took to Himself, therefore after
Him, as is
fit, is created also the people to come, David saying, 'Let this
be written
for another generation, and the people that shall be created shall
praise the
Lord(2).' And again in the twenty-first Psalm, 'The generation to
come shall
declare unto the Lord, and they shall declare His righteousness,
unto a people
that shall be born whom the Lord made(3).' For we shall no more
hear, 'In the
day that thou eatest thereof, thou shalt surely die but 'Where I
am, there ye'
shall 'be also;' so that we may say, 'We are His workmanship, created
unto
good works(5).' And again, since God's work, that is, man, though
created
perfect, has become wanting through the transgression, and dead
by sin, and it
was unbecoming that the work of God should remain imperfect (wherefore
all the
saints were praying concerning this, for instance in the hundred
and
thirty-seventh Psalm, saying, 'Lord, Thou shall requite for me;
despise not
then the works of Thine hands(6)); therefore the perfect(7) Word
of God puts
around Him an imperfect body, and is said to be created 'for the
works;' that,
paying the debts in our stead, He might, by Himself, perfect. what
was wanting
to man. Now immortality was wanting to him, and the way to paradise.
This then
is what the Saviour says, 'I glorified Thee on the earth, I perfected
the work
which Thou hast given Me to do(9);' and again, 'The works which
the Father
hath given Me to perfect, the same works that I do, bear witness
of Me;' but
'the works(10)' He here says that the Father had given Him to perfect,
are
those for which He is created, saying in the Proverbs, 'The Lord
created me a
beginning of His ways, for His works;' for it is all one to say,
'The Father
hath given me the works,' and 'The Lord created me for the works.'
67. When then received He the works to perfect, O God's enemies?
for from
this also 'He created' will be understood. If ye say, 'At the beginning
when
He brought them into being out of what was not,' it is an untruth;
for they
were not yet made; whereas He appears to speak as taking what was
already in
being. Nor is it pious to refer to the time
385
which preceded the Word's becoming flesh, lest His coming should
thereupon
seem superfluous, since for the sake of these works that coming
took place.
Therefore it remains for us to say that when He has become man,
then He took
the works. For then He perfected them, by healing our wounds and
vouchsafing
to us the resurrection from the dead. But if, when the Word became
flesh, then
were given to Him the works, plainly when He became man, then also
is He
created for the works. Not of His essence then is 'He created' indicative,
as
has many times been said, but of His bodily generation. For then,
because the
works were become imperfect and mutilated from the transgression,
He is said
in respect to the body to be created; that by perfecting them and
making them
whole, He might present the Church unto the Father, as the Apostle
says, 'not
having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but holy and without blemish(1).'
Mankind then is perfected in Him and restored, as it was made at
the
beginning, nay, with greater grace. For, on rising from the dead,
we shall no
longer fear death, but shall ever reign in Christ in the heavens.
And this has
been done, since the own Word of God Himself, who is from the Father,
has put
on the flesh, and become man. For if, being a creature, He had become
man, man
had remained just what he was, not joined to God; for how had a
work been
joined to the Creator by a work(2)? or what succour had come from
like to
like, when one as well as other needed it(3)? And how, were the
Word a
creature, had He power to undo God's sentence, and to remit sin,
whereas it
is written in the Prophets, that this is God's doing? For 'who is
a God like
unto Thee, that pardoneth iniquity, and passeth by transgression
(4)?' For
whereas God has said, 'Dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return(5),'
men
have become mortal; how then could things originate undo sin? but
the Lord is
He who has undone it, as He says Himself, 'Unless the Son shall
make you
free(6);' and the Son, who made free, has shewn in truth that He
is no
creature, nor one of things originate, but the proper Word and Image
of the
Father's Essence, who at the beginning sentenced, and alone remitteth
sins.
For since it is said in the Word, 'Dust thou art, and unto dust
thou shalt
return,' suitably through the Word Himself and in Him the freedom
and the
undoing of the condemnation has come to pass.
68. 'Yet,' they say, 'though the Saviour were a creature, God
was able to
speak the word only and undo the curse.' And so another will tell
them in like
manner, 'Without His coming among us at all, God was able just to
speak and
undo the curse;' but we must consider what was expedient for mankind,
and not
what simply is possible with God(1). He could have destroyed, before
the ark
of Noah, the then transgressors; but He did it after the ark. He
could too,
without Moses, have spoken the word only and have brought the people
out of
Egypt; but it pro-fired to do it through Moses. And God was able
without the
judges to save His people; but it was profitable for the people
that for a
season judges should be raised up to them. The Saviour too might
have come
among us from the beginning, or on His coming might not have been
delivered to
Pilate; but He came 'at the fulness of the ages(2),' and when sought
for said,
'I am He(3).' For what He does, that is profitable for men, and
was not
fitting in any other way; and what is profitable and fitting, for
that He
provides(4). Accordingly He came, not 'that He might be ministered
unto, but
that He might minister(5),' and might work our salvation. Certainly
He was
able to speak the Law from heaven, but He saw that it was expedient
to men for
Him to speak from Sinai; and that He has done, that it might be
possible for
Moses to go up, and for them hearing the word near them the rather
to believe.
Moreover, the good reason of what He did may be seen thus; if God
had but
spoken, because it was in His power, and so the curse had been undone,
the
power had been shewn of Him who gave the word, but man had become
such as Adam
was before the transgression, having received grace from without(6),
and not
having it united to the body; (for he was such when he was placed
in Paradise)
nay, perhaps had become worse,
386
because he had learned to transgress. Such then being his condition,
had he
been seduced by the serpent, there had been fresh need for God to
give command
and undo the curse; and thus the need had become interminable(7),
and men had
remained under guilt not less than before, as being enslaved to
sin; and, ever
sinning, would have ever needed one to pardon them, and had never
become free,
being in themselves flesh, and ever worsted by the Law because of
the
infirmity of the flesh.
69. Again, if the Son were a creature, man had remained mortal
as before,
not being joined to God; for a creature had not joined creatures
to God, as
seeking itself one to join it(1); nor would a portion of the creation
have
been the creation's salvation, as needing salvation itself. To provide
against
this also, He sends His own Son, and He becomes Son of Man, by taking
created
flesh; that, since all were under sentence of death, He, being other
than them
all, might Himself for all offer to death His own body; and that
henceforth,
as if all land died through Him, the word of that sentence might
be
accomplished (for 'all died(2)' in Christ), and all through Him
might
thereupon become free from sin and from the curse which came upon
it, and
might truly abide(3) for ever, risen from the dead and clothed in
immortality
and incorruption. For the Word being clothed in the flesh, as has
many times
been explained, every bite of the serpent began to be utterly staunched
from
out it; and whatever evil sprung from the motions of the flesh,
to be cut
away, and with these death also was abolished, the companion of
sin, as the
Lord Himself says(4), 'The prince of this world cometh, and findeth
nothing in
Me;' and 'For this end was He manifested,' as John has written,
'that He might
destroy the works of the devil(5).' And these being destroyed from
the flesh,
we all were thus liberated by the kinship of the flesh, and for
the future
were joined, even we, to the Word. And being joined to God, no longer
do we
abide upon earth; but, as He Himself has said, where He is, there
shall we be
also; and henceforward we shall fear no longer the serpent, for
he was brought
to nought when he was assailed by the Saviour in the flesh, and
heard Him say,
'Get thee behind Me, Satan(6),' and thus he is cast out of paradise
into the
eternal fire. Nor shall we have to watch against woman beguiling
us, for 'in
the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but
are as the
Angels(7);' and in Christ Jesus it shall be 'a new creation,' and
'neither
male nor female, but all and in all Christ(8);' and where Christ
is, what
fear, what danger can still happen?
70. But this would not have come to pass, had the Word been a
creature;
for with a creature, the devil, himself a creature, would have ever
continued
the battle, and man, being between the two, had been ever in peril
of death,
having none in whom and through whom he might be joined to God and
delivered
from all fear. Whence the truth shews us that the Word is not of
things
originate, but rather Himself their Framer. For therefore did He
assume the
body originate and human, that having renewed it as its Framer,
He might deify
it(1) in Himself, and thus might introduce us all into the kingdom
of heaven
after His likeness. For man had not been deified if joined to a
creature, or
unless the Son were very God; nor had man been brought into the
Father's
presence, unless He had been His natural and true Word who had put
on the
body. And as we had not been delivered from sin and the curse, unless
it had
been by nature human flesh, which the Word put on (for we should
have had
nothing common with what was foreign), so also the man had not been
deified,
unless the Word who became flesh had been by nature from the Father
and true
and proper to Him. For therefore the union was of this kind, that
He might
unite what is man by nature to Him who is in the nature of the Godhead,
and
his salvation and deification might be sure. Therefore let those
who deny that
the Son is from the Father by nature and proper to His Essence,
deny also that
He took true human flesh(2) of Mary Ever-Virgin(3); for in neither
case had it
been of profit to us men, whether the Word were not true and naturally
Son
387
of God, or the flesh not true which He assumed. But surely He took
true flesh,
though Valentinus rave; yea the Word was by nature Very God, though
Ariomaniacs rave(4); and in that flesh has come to pass the beginnings
of our
new creation, He being created man for our sake, and having made
for us that
new way, as has been said.
71. The Word then is neither creature nor work; for creature,
thing made,
work, are all one; and were He creature and thing made, He would
also be work.
Accordingly He has not said, 'He created Me a work,' nor 'He made
Me with the
works,' lest He should appear to be in nature and essence(6) a creature;
nor,
'He created Me to make works,' lest, on the other hand, according
to the
perverseness of the irreligious, He should seem as an instrument(7)
made for
our sake. Nor again has He declared, 'He created Me before the works,'
lest,
as He really is before all, as an Offspring, so, if created also
before the
works, He should give 'Offspring' and 'He created' the same meaning.
But He
has said with exact discrimination(8), 'for the works;' as much
as to say,
'The Father has made Me, into flesh, that I might be man,' which
again shews
that He is not a work but an offspring. For as he who comes into
a house, is
not part of the house, but is other than the house, so He who is
created for
the works, must be by nature other than the works. But if otherwise,
as you
hold, O Arians, the Word of God be a work, by what(9) Hand and Wisdom
did He
Himself come into being? for all things that came to be, came by
the Hand and
Wisdom of God, who Himself says, 'My hand hath made all these things(1);'
and
David says in the Psalm, 'And Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast
laid the
foundations of the earth, and the heavens are the work of Thy hands(2);'
and
again, in the hundred and forty-second Psalm, 'I do remember the
time past, I
muse upon all Thy works, yea I exercise myself in the works of Thy
hands(3).'
Therefore if by the Hand of God the works are wrought, and it is
written that
'all things were made through the Word,' and 'without Him was not
made one
thing(4),' and again, 'One Lord Jesus, through whom are all things,'
and 'in
Him all things consist(6),' it is very plain that the Son cannot
be a work,
but He is the Hand(7) of God and the Wisdom. This knowing, the martyrs
in
Babylon, Ananias, Azarias, and Misael, arraign the Arian irreligion.
For when
they say, 'O all ye works of the Lord, bless ye the Lord,' they
recount things
in heaven, things on earth, and the whole creation, as works; but
the Son they
name not. For they say not, 'Bless, O Word, and praise, O Wisdom;'
to shew
that all other things are both praising and are works; but the Word
is not a
work nor of those that praise, but is praised with the Father and
worshipped
and confessed as God(8), being His Word and Wisdom, and of the works
the
Framer. This too the Spirit has declared in the Psalms with a most
apposite
distinction, 'the Word of the Lord is true, and all His works are
faithful(9);' as in another Psalm too He says, 'O Lord, how manifold
are Thy
works! in Wisdom hast Thou made them all(10).'
72. But if the Word were a work, then certainly He as others had
been made
in Wisdom; nor would Scripture distinguish Him from the works, nor
while it
named them works, preach Him as Word and own Wisdom of God. But,
as it is,
distinguishing Him from the works, He shews that Wisdom is Framer
of the
works, and not a work. This distinction Paul also observes, writing
to the
Hebrews, 'The Word of God is quick and powerful, and sharper than
any
two-edged sword, reaching even to the dividing of soul and spirit,
joints and
marrow, and a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart,
neither is
there any creature hidden before Him, but all things are naked and
open unto
the eyes of Him with whom is our account(1).' For behold he calls
things
originate 'creature;' but the Son he recognises as the Word of God,
as if He
were other than the creatures. And again saying, 'All things are
naked and
open to the eyes of Him with whom is our account,' he signifies
that He is
other than all of them. For hence it is that He judges, but each
of all things
originate is bound to give account to Him. And so also, when the
whole
creation is groaning together with us in order to be set free from
the bondage
of corruption, the Son is thereby shewn to be other than the creatures.
For if
He were creature, He too would be one of those who groan, and would
need one
who should bring adoption and deliverance to Himself as well as
others. But if
the whole creation groans together, for the sake of freedom from
the bondage
of corruption, whereas the Son is not of those that groan nor of
those who
need freedom, but He it is who gives sonship and freedom to all,
saying to the
Jews of His
388
time(2), 'The servant remains not in the house for ever, but the
Son remaineth
for ever; if then the Son shall make you free, ye shall be free
indeed(3);' it
is clearer than the light from these considerations also, that the
Word of God
is not a creature but true Son, and by nature genuine, of the Father.
Concerning then 'The Lord hath created me a beginning of the ways,'
this is
sufficient, as I think, though in few words, to afford matter to
the learned
to frame more ample refutations of the Arian heresy.
CHAPTER XXII.
TEXTS EXPLAINED; SIXTHLY, THE CONTEXT
or PROVERBS viii. 22, viz. 22--30.
It is right to interpret this passage by the Regula Fidei. 'Founded'
is used
in contrast to superstructure; and it implies, as in the case of
stones in
building, previous existence. 'Before the world' signifies the divine
intention and purpose. Recurrence to Prov. viii. 22, and application
of it to
created Wisdom as seen in the works. The Son reveals the Father,
first by the
works, then by the Incarnation.
BUT since the heretics, reading the next verse, take a perverse
view of
that also, because it is written, 'He founded me before the world(4),'
namely,
that this is said of the Godhead of the Word and not of His incarnate
Presence(5), it is necessary, explaining this verse also, to shew
their error.
73. It is written, 'The Lord in Wisdom rounded the earth(1);'
if then by
Wisdom the earth is founded, how can He who founds be founded? nay,
this too
is said after the manner of proverbs(2), and we must in like manner
investigate its sense; that we may know that, while by Wisdom the
Father
frames and founds the earth to be firm and steadfast(3), Wisdom
Itself is
founded for us, that It may become beginning and foundation of our
new
creation and renewal. Accordingly here as before, He says not, 'Before
the
world He hath made me Word or Son,' lest there should be as it were
a
beginning of His making. For this we must seek before all things,
whether He
is Son(4), and on this point specially search the Scriptures(5);'
for this it
was, when the Apostles were questioned, that Peter answered, saying,
'Thou art
the Christ, the Son of the Living God(6)., This also the father(7)
of the
Arian heresy asked as one of his first questions; 'If Thou be the
Son of
God(8);' for he knew that this is the truth and the sovereign principle
of our
faith; and that, if He were Himself the Son, the tyranny of the
devil would
have its end; but if He were a creature, He too was one of those
descended
from that Adam whom he deceived, and he had no cause for anxiety.
For the same
reason the Jews of the day(9) were angered, because the Lord said
that He was
Son of God, and that God was His proper Father. For had He called
Himself one
of the creatures, or said, 'I am a work,' they had not been startled
at the
intelligence, nor thought such words blasphemy, knowing, as they
did, that
even Angels had come among their fathers; but since He called Himself
Son,
they perceived that such was not the note of a creature, but of
Godhead and of
the Father's nature(10). The Arians then ought, even in imitation
of their own
father the devil, to take some special pains(11) on this point;
and if He has
said, 'He founded me to be Word or Son,' then to think as they do;
but if He
has not so spoken, not to invent for themselves what is not.
74. For He says not, 'Before the world He founded me as Word or
Son,' but
simply, 'He founded me,' to shew again, as I have said, that not
for His own
sake(1) but for those who are built upon Him does He here also speak,
after
the way of proverbs. For this knowing, the Apostle also writes,
'Other
foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ;
but let
every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon(2).' And it must be
that the
foundation should be such as the things built on it, that they may
admit of
being well compacted together. Being then the Word, He has not,
as Word(3),
any such as Himself, who may be compacted with Him; for He is Only-begotten;
but having become man, He has the like of Him, those namely the
likeness of
whose flesh He has put on. Therefore according to His manhood He
is rounded,
that we, as precious stones, may admit of building upon Him, and
may become a
temple of the Holy Ghost who dwelleth in us. And as He is a foundation,
and we
stones built upon Him, so again He is a Vine and we knit to Him
as
branches,--not according to the Essence of the Godhead; for this
surely is
impossible; but according to His manhood, for the branches
389
must be like the vine, since we are like Him according to the flesh.
Moreover,
since the heretics have such human notions, we may suitably confute
them with
human resemblances contained in the very matter they urge. Thus
He saith not,
'He made me a foundation,' lest He might seem to be made and to
have a
beginning of being, and they might thence find a shameless occasion
of
irreligion; but, 'He founded me.' Now what is founded is founded
for the sake
of the stones which are raised upon it; it is not a random process,
but a
stone is first transported from the mountain and set down in the
depth of the
earth. And while a stone is in the mountain, it is not yet founded;
but when
need demands, and it is transported, and laid in the depth of the
earth, then
forthwith if the stone could speak, it would say, 'He now founded
me, who
brought me hither from the mountain.' Therefore the Lord also did
not when
rounded take a beginning of existence; for He was the Word before
that; but
when He put on our body, which He severed and took from Mary, then
He says 'He
hath founded me;' as much as to say, 'Me, being the Word, He hath
enveloped in
a body of earth.' For so He is founded for our sakes, taking on
Him what is
ours(4), that we, as incorporated and compacted and bound together
in Him
through the likeness of the flesh, may attain unto a perfect man,
and abide(5)
immortal and incorruptible.
75. Nor let the words 'before the world' and 'before He made the
earth'
and 'before the mountains were settled' disturb any one; for they
very well
accord with 'founded' and 'created;' for here again allusion is
made to the
Economy according to the flesh. For though the grace which came
to us from
the Saviour appeared, as the Apostle says, just now, and has come
when He
sojourned among us; yet this grace had been prepared even before
we came into
being, nay, before the foundation of the world, and the reason why
is kindly
and wonderful. It beseemed not that God should counsel concerning
us
afterwards, lest He should appear ignorant of our fate. The God
of all
then,--creating us by His own Word, and knowing our destinies better
than we,
and foreseeing that, being made 'good(1),' we should in the event
be
transgressors of the commandment, and be thrust out of paradise
for
disobedience,--being loving and kind, prepared beforehand in His
own Word, by
whom also. He created us(2), the Economy of our salvation; that
though by the
serpent's deceit we fell from Him, we might not remain quite dead,
but having
in the Word the redemption and salvation which was afore prepared
for us, we
might rise again and abide immortal, what time He should have been
created
for us 'a beginning of the ways,' and He who was the 'First-born
of creation'
should become 'first-born' of the 'brethren,' and again should rise
'first-fruits of the dead.' This Paul the blessed Apostle teaches
in his
writings; for, as interpreting the words of the Proverbs 'before
the world'
and before the earth was,' he thus speaks to Timothy(3); 'Be partaker
of the
afflictions of the Gospel according to the power of God, who hath
saved us and
called us with a holy calling, not according to our works, but according
to
His own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before
the world
began, but is now made manifest by the appearing of our Saviour
Jesus Christ,
who hath abolished death, and brought to light life(4).' And to
the Ephesians;
'Blessed be God even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath
blessed us
with all spiritual blessing in heavenly places in Christ Jesus,
according as
He hath chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world, that
we should be
holy and without blame before Him in love, having predestinated
us to the
adoption of children by Jesus Christ to Himself(5).'
76. How then has He chosen us, before we came into existence,
but that, as
he says himself, in Him we were represented(6) beforehand? and how
at all,
before men were created, did He predestinate us unto adoption, but
that the
Son Himself was 'founded before the world,' taking on Him that economy
which
was for our sake? or how, as the Apostle goes on to say, have we
'an
inheritance being predestinated,' but that the Lord Himself was
founded
'before the world,' inasmuch as He had a purpose, for our sakes,
to take on
Him through the flesh all that inheritance of judgment which lay
against us,
and we henceforth were made sons in Him? and how did we receive
it 'before the
world was,' when we were not yet in being, but afterwards in time,
but that in
Christ was stored the grace which has reached us? Wherefore also
in the
Judgment, when every one shall receive according to his conduct,
He says,
'Come, ye blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for
you from the
foundation of the world(1).' How then, or in whom, was it prepared
before we
came to be, save in the Lord who 'before the world' was founded
for this
purpose; that we, as built upon Him, might partake, as well-compacted
stones,
the life and grace which is from Him? And this took place, as natur-
390
ally suggests itself to the religious mind, that, as I said, we,
rising after
our brief death, may be capable of an eternal life, of which we
had not been
capable(2), men as we are, formed of earth, but that 'before the
world' there
had been prepared for us in Christ the hope of life and salvation.
Therefore
reason is there that the Word, on coming into our flesh, and being
created in
it as 'a beginning of ways for His works,' is laid as a foundation
according
as the Father's will(3) was in Him before the world, as has been
said, and
before land was, and before the mountains were settled, and before
the
fountains burst forth; that, though the earth and the mountains
and the shapes
of visible nature pass away in the fulness of the present age, we
on the
contrary may not grow old after their pattern, but may be able to
live after
them, having the spiritual life and blessing which before these
things have
been prepared for us in the Word Himself according to election.
For thus we
shall be capable of a life not temporary, but ever afterwards abide(4)
and
live in Christ; since even before this our life had been founded
and prepared
in Christ Jesus.
77. Nor in any other way was it fitting that our life should be
founded,
but in the Lord who is before the ages, and through whom the ages
were brought
to be; that, since it was in Him, we too might be able to inherit
that
everlasting life. For God is good; and being good always, He willed
this, as
knowing that our weak nature needed the succour and salvation which
is from
Him. And as a wise architect, proposing to build a house, consults
also about
repairing it, should it at any time become dilapidated after building,
and, as
counselling about this, makes preparation and gives to the workmen
materials
for a repair; and thus the means of the repair are provided before
the house;
in the same way prior to us is the repair of our salvation founded
in Christ,
that in Him we might even be new-created. And the will and the purpose
were
made ready 'before the world,' but have taken effect when the need
required,
and the Saviour came among us. For the Lord Himself will stand us
in place of
all things in the heavens, when He receives us into everlasting
life. This
then suffices to prove that the Word of God is not a creature, but
that the
sense of the passage is right(5). But since that passage, when scrutinized,
has a right sense in every point of view, it may be well to state
what it is;
perhaps many words may bring these senseless men to shame. Now here
I must
recur to what has been said before, for what I have to say relates
to the same
proverb and the same Wisdom. The Word has not called Himself a creature
by
nature, but has said in proverbs, 'The Lord created me;' and He
plainly
indicates a sense not spoken 'plainly' but latent(6), such as we
shall be able
to find by taking away the veil from the proverb. For who, on hearing
from the
Framing Wisdom, 'The Lord created me a beginning of His ways,(3)
does not at
once question the meaning, reflecting how that creative Wisdom can
be created?
who on hearing the Only-begotten Son of God say, that He was created
'a
beginning of ways,' does not investigate the sense, wondering how
the
Only-begotten Son can become a Beginning of many others? for it
is a dark
saying(7); but 'a man of understanding,' says he, 'shall understand
a proverb
and the interpretation, the words of the wise and their dark sayings(8).'
78. Now the Only-begotten and very Wisdom(1) of God is Creator
and Framer
of all things; for 'in Wisdom hast Thou made them all(2),' he says,
and 'the
earth is full of Thy creation.' But that what came into being might
not only
be, but be good(3), it pleased God that His own Wisdom should condescend(4)
to
the creatures, so as to introduce an impress and semblance of Its
Image on all
in common and on each, that what was made might be manifestly wise
works and
worthy of God(5). For as of the Son of God, considered as the Word,
our word
is an image, so of the same Son considered as Wisdom is the wisdom
which is
implanted in us an image; in which wisdom we, having the power of
knowledge
and thought, become recipients of the All-framing Wisdom; and through
It we
are able to know Its Father. 'For he who hath the Son,' saith He,
'hath the
Father also;' and 'he that receiveth Me, receiveth Him that sent
Me(6).' Such
an impress then of Wisdom being created in us, and being in all
the works,
with reason does the true and framing Wisdom take to Itself what
belongs to
its own impress, and say, 'The Lord created me for His works;' for
what the
wisdom in us says, that
391
the Lord Himself speaks as if it were His own; and, whereas He
is not Himself
created, being Creator, yet because of the image of Him created
in the
works(7), He says this as if of Himself. And as the Lord Himself
has said, 'He
that receiveth you, receiveth Me(8),' because His impress is in
us, so,
though He be not among the creatures, yet because His image and
impress is
created in the works, He says, as if in His own person, 'The Lord
created me a
beginning of His ways for His works.' And therefore has this impress
of Wisdom
in the works been brought into being, that, as I said before, the
world might
recognise in it its own Creator the Word, and through Him the Father.
And this
is what Paul said, 'Because that which may be known of God is manifest
in
them, for God has shewed it unto them: for the invisible things
of Him from
the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by
the things
that are made(9).' But if so, the Word is not a creature in essence(10);
but
the wisdom which is in us and so called, is spoken of in this passage
in the
Proverbs.
79. But if this too fails to persuade them, let them tell us themselves,
whether there is any wisdom in the creatures or not(1)? If not how
is it that
the Apostle complains, 'For after that in the Wisdom of God the
world by
wisdom knew not God(2)?' or how is it if there is no wisdom, that
a 'multitude
of wise men(3)' are found in Scripture? for 'a wise man feareth
and departeth
from evil(4);' and 'through wisdom is a house builded(5);' and the
Preacher
says, 'A man's wisdom maketh his face to shine;' and he blames those
who are
headstrong thus, 'Say not thou, what is the cause that the former
days were
better than these? for thou dost not inquire in wisdom concerning
this(6).'
But if, as the Son of Sirach says, 'He poured her out upon all His
works; she
is with all flesh according to His gift, and He hath given her to
them that
love Him(7),' and this outpouring is a note, not of the Essence
of the Very(8)
Wisdom and Only-begotten, but of that wisdom which is imaged in
the world, how
is it incredible that the All-framing and true Wisdom Itself, whose
impress is
the wisdom and knowledge poured out in the world, should say, as
I have
already explained, as if of Itself, 'The Lord created me for His
works?' For
the wisdom in the world is not creative, but is that which is created
in the
works, according to which 'the heavens declare the glory of God,
and the
firmament sheweth His handywork(9).' This if men have within them(10),
they
will acknowledge the true Wisdom of God; and will know that they
are made
really(11) after God's Image. And, as some son of a king, when the
father
wished to build a city(12), might cause his own name to be printed
upon each
of the works that were rising, both to give security to them of
the works
remaining, by reason of the show of his name on everything, and
also to make
them remember him and his father from the name, and having finished
the city
might be asked concerning it, how it was made, and then would answer,
'It is
made securely, for according to the will of my father, I am imaged
in each
work, for my name was made in the works;' but saying this, he does
not signify
that his own essence is created, but the impress of himself by means
of his
name; in the same manner, to apply the illustration, to those who
admire the
wisdom in the creatures, the true Wisdom makes answer, 'The Lord
created me
for the works,' for my impress is in them; and I have thus condescended
for
the framing of all things.
80. Moreover, that the Son should be speaking of the impress that
is
within us as if it were Himself, should not startle any one, considering
(for
we must not shrink from repetition(1)) that, when Saul was persecuting
the
Church, in which was His impress and image, He said, as if He were
Himself
under persecution, 'Saul, why persecutest thou Me(2)?' Therefore
(as has been
said), as, supposing the impress itself of Wisdom which is in the
works had
said, 'The Lord created me for the works,' no one would have been
startled,
so, if He, the True and Framing Wisdom, the Only-begotten Word of
God, should
use what belongs to His image as about Himself, namely, 'The Lord
created me
for the works,' let no one, overlooking the wisdom created in the
world and
392
in the works, think that 'He created' is said of the Substance
of the Very(3)
Wisdom, lest, diluting the wine with water(3a), he be judged a defrauder
of
the truth. For It is Creative and Framer; but Its impress is created
in the
works, as the copy of the image. And He says, 'Beginning of ways,'
since such
wisdom becomes a sort of beginning. and, as it were, rudiments of
the
knowledge of God; for a man entering, as it were, upon this way
first, and
keeping it in the fear of God (as Solomon says(4), 'The fear of
the Lord is
the beginning of wisdom'), then advancing upwards in his thoughts
and
perceiving the Framing Wisdom which is in the creation, will perceive
in It
also Its Father(5), as the Lord Himself has said, 'He that hath
seen Me, hath
seen the Father,' and as John writes, 'He who acknowledgeth the
Son, hath the
Father also(6).' And He says, 'Before the world He founded me(7),'
since in
Its impress the works remain settled and eternal. Then, lest any,
hearing
concerning the wisdom thus created in the works, should think the
true Wisdom,
God's Son, to be by nature a creature, He has found it necessary
to add,
'Before the mountains, and before the earth, and before the waters,
and before
all hills He begets me,' that in saying, 'before every creature'
(for He
includes all the creation under these heads), He may shew that He
is not
created together with the works according to Essence. For if He
was created
'for the works,' yet is before them, it follows that He is in being
before He
was created. He is not then a creature by nature and essence, but
as He
Himself has added, an Offspring. But in what differs a creature
from an
offspring, and how it is distinct by nature, has been shewn in what
has gone
before.
81. But since He proceeds to say, 'When He prepared the heaven,
I was
present with Him(8),' we ought to know that He says not this as
if without
Wisdom the Father prepared the heaven or the clouds above (for there
is no
room to doubt that all things are created in Wisdom, and without
It was made
not even one(1) thing); but this is what He says, 'All things took
place in Me
and through Me, and when there was need that Wisdom should be, created
in the
works, in My Essence indeed I was with the Father, but by a condescension(2)
to things originate, I was disposing over the works My own impress,
so that
the whole world as being in one body, might not be at variance but
in concord
with itself.' All those then who with an upright understanding,
according to
the wisdom given unto them, come to contemplate the creatures, are
able to say
for themselves, 'By Thy appointment all things continue(3);' but
they who make
light of this must be told, 'Professing themselves to be wise, they
became
fools;' for 'that which may be known of God is manifest in them;
for God has
revealed it unto them; for the invisible things of Him from the
creation of
the world are clearly seen, being perceived by the things that are
made, even
His eternal Power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse.
Because that
when they knew God, they glorified Him not as God, but served the
creature
more than the Creator of all, who is blessed for ever. Amen(4).'
And they will
surely be shamed at hearing, 'For, after that in the wisdom of God
(in the
mode we have explained above), the world by wisdom knew not God,
it pleased
God by the foolishness of the preaching to save them that believe(5).'
For no
longer, as in the former times, God has willed to be known by an
image and
shadow of wisdom, that namely which is in the creatures, but He
has made the
true Wisdom Itself to take flesh, and to become man, and to undergo
the death
of the cross; that by the faith in Him, henceforth all that believe
may obtain
salvation. However, it is the same Wisdom of God, which through
Its own Image
in the creatures (whence also It is said to be created), first manifested
Itself, and through Itself Its own Father; and afterwards, being
Itself the
Word, has 'become flesh(6),' as John says, and after abolishing
death and
saving our race, still more revealed Himself and through Him His
own Father,
saying, 'Grant unto them that they may know Thee the only true God,
and Jesus
Christ whom Thou hast sent(7).'
82. Hence the whole earth is filled with the knowledge of Him;
for the
knowledge of Father through Son and of Son from Father is one and
the same,
and the Father delights in Him, and in the same joy the Son rejoices
in the
Father, saying, 'I was by Him, daily His delight, rejoicing always
before
Him(1).' And this again proves that the Son is not foreign, but
proper to the
Father's Essence. For behold, not because of us has He come to be,
393
as the irreligious men say, nor is He out of nothing (for not from
without did
God procure for Himself a cause of rejoicing), but the words denote
what is
His own and like. When then was it, when the Father rejoiced not?
but if He
ever rejoiced, He was ever, in whom He rejoiced. And in whom does
the Father
rejoice, except as seeing Himself in His own Image, which is His
Word? And
though in sons of men also He had delight, on finishing the world,
as it is
written in these same Proverbs(2), yet this too has a consistent
sense. For
even thus He had delight, not because joy was added to Him, but
again on
seeing the works made after His own Image; so that even this rejoicing
of God
is on account of His Image. And how too has the Son delight, except
as seeing
Himself in the Father? for this is the same as saying, 'He that
hath seen Me,
hath seen the Father,' and 'I am in the Father and the Father in
Me(3).' Vain
then is your vaunt as is on all sides shewn, O Christ's enemies,
and vainly
did ye parade(4) and circulate everywhere your text, 'The Lord created
me a
beginning of His ways,' perverting its sense, and publishing, not
Solomon's
meaning, but your own comment(5). For behold your sense is proved
to be but a
fantasy; but the passage in the Proverbs, as well as all that is
above said,
proves that the Son is not a creature in nature and essence, but
the proper
Offspring of the Father, true Wisdom and Word, by whom 'all things
were made,'
and 'without Him was made not one thing