WE must, in the next place, investigate the subject of the dream, and first inquire to which of the faculties of the soul it presents itself, i.e. whether the affection is one which pertains to the faculty of intelligence or to that of sense-perception; for these are the only faculties within us by which we acquire knowledge.
If, then, the exercise of the faculty of sight is actual seeing, that of the auditory faculty, hearing, and, in general that of the faculty of sense-perception, perceiving; and if there are some perceptions common to the senses, such as figure, magnitude, motion, &c., while there are others, as colour, sound, taste, peculiar [each to its own sense]; and further, if all creatures, when the eyes are closed in sleep, are unable to see, and the analogous statement is true of the other senses, so that manifestly we perceive nothing when asleep; we may conclude that it is not by sense-perception we perceive a dream.
But neither is it by opinion that we do so. For [in dreams] we not only assert, e.g. that some object approaching is a man or a horse [which would be an exercise of opinion], but that the object is white or beautiful, points on which opinion without sense-perception asserts nothing either truly or falsely. It is, however, a fact that the soul makes such assertions in sleep. We seem to see equally well that the approaching figure is a man, and that it is white. [In dreams], too, we think something else, over and above the dream presentation, just as we do in waking moments when we perceive something; for we often also reason about that which we perceive. So, too, in sleep we sometimes have thoughts other than the mere phantasms immediately before our minds. This would be manifest to any one who should attend and try, immediately on arising from sleep, to remember [his dreaming experiences]. There are cases of persons who have seen such dreams, those, for example, who believe themselves to be mentally arranging a given list of subjects according to the mnemonic rule. They frequently find themselves engaged in something else besides the dream, viz. in setting a phantasm which they envisage into its mnemonic position. Hence it is plain that not every 'phantasm' in sleep is a mere dream-image, and that the further thinking which we perform then is due to an exercise of the faculty of opinion.
So much at least is plain on all these points, viz. that the faculty by which, in waking hours, we are subject to illusion when affected by disease, is identical with that which produces illusory effects in sleep. So, even when persons are in excellent health, and know the facts of the case perfectly well, the sun, nevertheless, appears to them to be only a foot wide. Now, whether the presentative faculty of the soul be identical with, or different from, the faculty of sense-perception, in either case the illusion does not occur without our actually seeing or [otherwise] perceiving something. Even to see wrongly or to hear wrongly can happen only to one who sees or hears something real, though not exactly what he supposes. But we have assumed that in sleep one neither sees, nor hears, nor exercises any sense whatever. Perhaps we may regard it as true that the dreamer sees nothing, yet as false that his faculty of sense-perception is unaffected, the fact being that the sense of seeing and the other senses may possibly be then in a certain way affected, while each of these affections, as duly as when he is awake, gives its impulse in a certain manner to his [primary] faculty of sense, though not in precisely the same manner as when he is awake. Sometimes, too, opinion says [to dreamers] just as to those who are awake, that the object seen is an illusion; at other times it is inhibited, and becomes a mere follower of the phantasm.
It is plain therefore that this affection, which we name 'dreaming', is no mere exercise of opinion or intelligence, but yet is not an affection of the faculty of perception in the simple sense. If it were the latter it would be possible [when asleep] to hear and see in the simple sense.
How then, and in what manner, it takes place, is what we have to examine. Let us assume, what is indeed clear enough, that the affection [of dreaming] pertains to sense-perception as surely as sleep itself does. For sleep does not pertain to one organ in animals and dreaming to another; both pertain to the same organ.
But since we have, in our work On the Soul, treated of presentation, and the faculty of presentation is identical with that of sense-perception, though the essential notion of a faculty of presentation is different from that of a faculty of sense-perception; and since presentation is the movement set up by a sensory faculty when actually discharging its function, while a dream appears to be a presentation (for a presentation which occurs in sleep- whether simply or in some particular way- is what we call a dream): it manifestly follows that dreaming is an activity of the faculty of sense-perception, but belongs to this faculty qua presentative.
We can best obtain a scientific view of the nature of the dream and the manner in which it originates by regarding it in the light of the circumstances attending sleep. The objects of sense-perception corresponding to each sensory organ produce sense-perception in us, and the affection due to their operation is present in the organs of sense not only when the perceptions are actualized, but even when they have departed.
What happens in these cases may be compared with what happens in the case of projectiles moving in space. For in the case of these the movement continues even when that which set up the movement is no longer in contact [with the things that are moved]. For that which set them in motion moves a certain portion of air, and this, in turn, being moved excites motion in another portion; and so, accordingly, it is in this way that [the bodies], whether in air or in liquids, continue moving, until they come to a standstill.
This we must likewise assume to happen in the case of qualitative
change; for that part which [for example] has been heated by something
hot, heats [in turn] the part next to it, and this propagates the
affection continuously onwards until the process has come round
to its point of origination. This must also happen in the organ
wherein the exercise of sense-perception takes place, since sense-perception,
as realized in actual perceiving, is a mode of qualitative change.
This explains why the affection continues in the sensory organs,
both in their deeper and in their more superficial parts, not merely
while they are actually engaged in perceiving, but even after they
have ceased to do so. That they do this, indeed, is obvious in cases
where we continue for some time engaged in a particular form of
perception, for then, when we shift the scene of our perceptive
activity, the previous affection remains; for instance, when we
have turned our gaze from sunlight into darkness. For the result
of this is that one sees nothing, owing to the motion excited by
the light still subsisting in our eyes. Also, when we have looked
steadily for a long while at one colour, e.g. at white or green,
that to which we next transfer our gaze appears to be of the same
colour. Again if, after having looked at the sun or some other brilliant
object, we close the eyes, then, if we watch carefully, it appears
in a right line with the direction of vision (whatever this may
be), at first in its own colour; then it changes to crimson, next
to purple, until it becomes black and disappears. And also when
persons turn away from looking at objects in motion, e.g. rivers,
and especially those which flow very rapidly, they find that the
visual stimulations still present themselves, for the things really
at rest are then seen moving: persons become very deaf after hearing
loud noises, and after smelling very strong odours their power of
smelling is impaired; and similarly in other cases. These phenomena
manifestly take place in the way above described.
That the sensory organs are acutely sensitive to even a slight qualitative difference [in their objects] is shown by what happens in the case of mirrors; a subject to which, even taking it independently, one might devote close consideration and inquiry. At the same time it becomes plain from them that as the eye [in seeing] is affected [by the object seen], so also it produces a certain effect upon it. 'If a woman chances during her menstrual period to look into a highly polished mirror, the surface of it will grow cloudy with a blood-coloured haze. It is very hard to remove this stain from a new mirror, but easier to remove from an older mirror. As we have said before, the cause of this lies in the fact that in the act of sight there occurs not only a passion in the sense organ acted on by the polished surface, but the organ, as an agent, also produces an action, as is proper to a brilliant object. For sight is the property of an organ possessing brilliance and colour. The eyes, therefore, have their proper action as have other parts of the body. Because it is natural to the eye to be filled with blood-vessels, a woman's eyes, during the period of menstrual flux and inflammation, will undergo a change, although her husband will not note this since his seed is of the same nature as that of his wife. The surrounding atmosphere, through which operates the action of sight, and which surrounds the mirror also, will undergo a change of the same sort that occurred shortly before in the woman's eyes, and hence the surface of the mirror is likewise affected. And as in the case of a garment, the cleaner it is the more quickly it is soiled, so the same holds true in the case of the mirror. For anything that is clean will show quite clearly a stain that it chances to receive, and the cleanest object shows up even the slightest stain. A bronze mirror, because of its shininess, is especially sensitive to any sort of contact (the movement of the surrounding air acts upon it like a rubbing or pressing or wiping); on that account, therefore, what is clean will show up clearly the slightest touch on its surface. It is hard to cleanse smudges off new mirrors because the stain penetrates deeply and is suffused to all parts; it penetrates deeply because the mirror is not a dense medium, and is suffused widely because of the smoothness of the object. On the other hand, in the case of old mirrors, stains do not remain because they do not penetrate deeply, but only smudge the surface.'
From this therefore it is plain that stimulatory motion is set up even by slight differences, and that sense-perception is quick to respond to it; and further that the organ which perceives colour is not only affected by its object, but also reacts upon it. Further evidence to the same point is afforded by what takes place in wines, and in the manufacture of unguents. For both oil, when prepared, and wine become rapidly infected by the odours of the things near them; they not only acquire the odours of the things thrown into or mixed with them, but also those of the things which are placed, or which grow, near the vessels containing them.
In order to answer our original question, let us now, therefore, assume one proposition, which is clear from what precedes, viz. that even when the external object of perception has departed, the impressions it has made persist, and are themselves objects of perception; and [let us assume], besides, that we are easily deceived respecting the operations of sense-perception when we are excited by emotions, and different persons according to their different emotions; for example, the coward when excited by fear, the amorous person by amorous desire; so that, with but little resemblance to go upon, the former thinks he sees his foes approaching, the latter, that he sees the object of his desire; and the more deeply one is under the influence of the emotion, the less similarity is required to give rise to these illusory impressions. Thus too, both in fits of anger, and also in all states of appetite, all men become easily deceived, and more so the more their emotions are excited. This is the reason too why persons in the delirium of fever sometimes think they see animals on their chamber walls, an illusion arising from the faint resemblance to animals of the markings thereon when put together in patterns; and this sometimes corresponds with the emotional states of the sufferers, in such a way that, if the latter be not very ill, they know well enough that it is an illusion; but if the illness is more severe they actually move according to the appearances. The cause of these occurrences is that the faculty in virtue of which the controlling sense judges is not identical with that in virtue of which presentations come before the mind. A proof of this is, that the sun presents itself as only a foot in diameter, though often something else gainsays the presentation. Again, when the fingers are crossed, the one object [placed between them] is felt [by the touch] as two; but yet we deny that it is two; for sight is more authoritative than touch. Yet, if touch stood alone, we should actually have pronounced the one object to be two. The ground of such false judgements is that any appearances whatever present themselves, not only when its object stimulates a sense, but also when the sense by itself alone is stimulated, provided only it be stimulated in the same manner as it is by the object. For example, to persons sailing past the land seems to move, when it is really the eye that is being moved by something else [the moving ship.]
From this it is manifest that the stimulatory movements based upon
sensory impressions, whether the latter are derived from external
objects or from causes within the body, present themselves not only
when persons are awake, but also then, when this affection which
is called sleep has come upon them, with even greater impressiveness.
For by day, while the senses and the intellect are working together,
they (i.e. such movements) are extruded from consciousness or obscured,
just as a smaller is beside a larger fire, or as small beside great
pains or pleasures, though, as soon as the latter have ceased, even
those which are trifling emerge into notice. But by night [i.e.
in sleep] owing to the inaction of the particular senses, and their
powerlessness to realize themselves, which arises from the reflux
of the hot from the exterior parts to the interior, they [i.e. the
above 'movements'] are borne in to the head quarters of sense-perception,
and there display themselves as the disturbance (of waking life)
subsides. We must suppose that, like the little eddies which are
being ever formed in rivers, so the sensory movements are each a
continuous process, often remaining like what they were when first
started, but often, too, broken into other forms by collisions with
obstacles. This [last mentioned point], moreover, gives the reason
why no dreams occur in sleep immediately after meals, or to sleepers
who are extremely young, e.g. to infants. The internal movement
in such cases is excessive, owing to the heat generated from the
food. Hence, just as in a liquid, if one vehemently disturbs it,
sometimes no reflected image appears, while at other times one appears,
indeed, but utterly distorted, so as to seem quite unlike its original;
while, when once the motion has ceased, the reflected images are
clear and plain; in the same manner during sleep the phantasms,
or residuary movements, which are based upon the sensory impressions,
become sometimes quite obliterated by the above described motion
when too violent; while at other times the sights are indeed seen,
but confused and weird, and the dreams [which then appear] are unhealthy,
like those of persons who are atrabilious, or feverish, or intoxicated
with wine. For all such affections, being spirituous, cause much
commotion and disturbance. In sanguineous animals, in proportion
as the blood becomes calm, and as its purer are separated from its
less pure elements, the fact that the movement, based on impressions
derived from each of the organs of sense, is preserved in its integrity,
renders the dreams healthy, causes a [clear] image to present itself,
and makes the dreamer think, owing to the effects borne in from
the organ of sight, that he actually sees, and owing to those which
come from the organ of hearing, that he really hears; and so on
with those also which proceed from the other sensory organs. For
it is owing to the fact that the movement which reaches the primary
organ of sense comes from them, that one even when awake believes
himself to see, or hear, or otherwise perceive; just as it is from
a belief that the organ of sight is being stimulated, though in
reality not so stimulated, that we sometimes erroneously declare
ourselves to see, or that, from the fact that touch announces two
movements, we think that the one object is two. For, as a rule,
the governing sense affirms the report of each particular sense,
unless another particular sense, more authoritative, makes a contradictory
report. In every case an appearance presents itself, but what appears
does not in every case seem real, unless when the deciding faculty
is inhibited, or does not move with its proper motion. Moreover,
as we said that different men are subject to illusions, each according
to the different emotion present in him, so it is that the sleeper,
owing to sleep, and to the movements then going on in his sensory
organs, as well as to the other facts of the sensory process, [is
liable to illusion], so that the dream presentation, though but
little like it, appears as some actual given thing. For when one
is asleep, in proportion as most of the blood sinks inwards to its
fountain [the heart], the internal [sensory] movements, some potential,
others actual accompany it inwards. They are so related [in general]
that, if anything move the blood, some one sensory movement will
emerge from it, while if this perishes another will take its place;
while to one another also they are related in the same way as the
artificial frogs in water which severally rise [in fixed succession]
to the surface in the order in which the salt [which keeps them
down] becomes dissolved. The residuary movements are like these:
they are within the soul potentially, but actualize themselves only
when the impediment to their doing so has been relaxed; and according
as they are thus set free, they begin to move in the blood which
remains in the sensory organs, and which is now but scanty, while
they possess verisimilitude after the manner of cloud-shapes, which
in their rapid metamorphoses one compares now to human beings and
a moment afterwards to centaurs. Each of them is however, as has
been said, the remnant of a sensory impression taken when sense
was actualizing itself; and when this, the true impression, has
departed, its remnant is still immanent, and it is correct to say
of it, that though not actually Koriskos, it is like Koriskos. For
when the person was actually perceiving, his controlling and judging
sensory faculty did not call it Koriskos, but, prompted by this
[impression], called the genuine person yonder Koriskos. Accordingly,
this sensory impulse, which, when actually perceiving, it [the controlling
faculty] so describes (unless completely inhibited by the blood),
it now [in dreams] when quasi-perceiving, receives from the movements
persisting in the sense-organs, and mistakes it- an impulse that
is merely like the true [objective] impression- for the true impression
itself, while the effect of sleep is so great that it causes this
mistake to pass unnoticed. Accordingly, just as if a finger be inserted
beneath the eyeball without being observed, one object will not
only present two visual images, but will create an opinion of its
being two objects; while if it [the finger] be observed, the presentation
will be the same, but the same opinion will not be formed of it;
exactly so it is in states of sleep: if the sleeper perceives that
he is asleep, and is conscious of the sleeping state during which
the perception comes before his mind, it presents itself still,
but something within him speaks to this effect: 'the image of Koriskos
presents itself, but the real Koriskos is not present'; for often,
when one is asleep, there is something in consciousness which declares
that what then presents itself is but a dream. If, however, he is
not aware of being asleep, there is nothing which will contradict
the testimony of the bare presentation.
That what we here urge is true, i.e. that there are such presentative movements in the sensory organs, any one may convince himself, if he attends to and tries to remember the affections we experience when sinking into slumber or when being awakened. He will sometimes, in the moment of awakening, surprise the images which present themselves to him in sleep, and find that they are really but movements lurking in the organs of sense. And indeed some very young persons, if it is dark, though looking with wide open eyes, see multitudes of phantom figures moving before them, so that they often cover up their heads in terror.
From all this, then, the conclusion to be drawn is, that the dream is a sort of presentation, and, more particularly, one which occurs in sleep; since the phantoms just mentioned are not dreams, nor is any other a dream which presents itself when the sense-perceptions are in a state of freedom. Nor is every presentation which occurs in sleep necessarily a dream. For in the first place, some persons [when asleep] actually, in a certain way, perceive sounds, light, savour, and contact; feebly, however, and, as it were, remotely. For there have been cases in which persons while asleep, but with the eyes partly open, saw faintly in their sleep (as they supposed) the light of a lamp, and afterwards, on being awakened, straightway recognized it as the actual light of a real lamp; while, in other cases, persons who faintly heard the crowing of cocks or the barking of dogs identified these clearly with the real sounds as soon as they awoke. Some persons, too, return answers to questions put to them in sleep.
For it is quite possible that, of waking or sleeping, while the
one is present in the ordinary sense, the other also should be present
in a certain way. But none of these occurrences should be called
a dream. Nor should the true thoughts, as distinct from the mere
presentations, which occur in sleep [be called dreams]. The dream
proper is a presentation based on the movement of sense impressions,
when such presentation occurs during sleep, taking sleep in the
strict sense of the term.
There are cases of persons who in their whole lives have never had a dream, while others dream when considerably advanced in years, having never dreamed before. The cause of their not having dreams appears somewhat like that which operates in the case of infants, and [that which operates] immediately after meals. It is intelligible enough that no dream-presentation should occur to persons whose natural constitution is such that in them copious evaporation is borne upwards, which, when borne back downwards, causes a large quantity of motion. But it is not surprising that, as age advances, a dream should at length appear to them. Indeed, it is inevitable that, as a change is wrought in them in proportion to age or emotional experience, this reversal [from non-dreaming to dreaming] should occur also.