Native American Religion
in Early America
Christine Leigh Heyrman
Department of History, University of Delaware
© National Humanities Center Links to online resources
From: http://www.nhc.rtp.nc.us:8080/tserve/eighteen/ekeyinfo/natrel.htm Teaching about Native American religion is a challenging task to tackle with
students at any level, if only because the Indian systems of belief and ritual
were as legion as the tribes inhabiting North America. So let's begin by trimming
down that bewildering variety to manageable proportions with three glittering
generalizations (which might, with luck, prove more useful than misleading).
First, at the time of European contact, all but the simplest indigenous cultures
in North America had developed coherent religious systems that included cosmologies--creation
myths, transmitted orally from one generation to the next, which purported
to explain how those societies had come into being.
Second, most native peoples worshiped an all-powerful, all-knowing Creator
or "Master Spirit" (a being that assumed a variety of forms and both
genders). They also venerated or placated a host of lesser supernatural entities,
including an evil god who dealt out disaster, suffering, and death.
Third and finally, the members of most tribes believed in the immortality of
the human soul and an afterlife, the main feature of which was the abundance
of every good thing that made earthly life secure and pleasant.
Like all other cultures, the Indian societies of North America hoped to enlist
the aid of the supernatural in controlling the natural and social world, and
each tribe had its own set of religious observances devoted to that aim. Individuals
tried to woo or appease powerful spiritual entities with private prayers or
sacrifices of valuable items (e.g., furs, tobacco, food), but when entire communities
sought divine assistance to ensure a successful hunt, a good harvest, or victory
in warfare, they called upon shamans, priests, and, in fewer tribes, priestesses,
whom they believed to have acquired supernatural powers through visions. These
uncommon abilities included predicting the future and influencing the weather--
matters of vital interest to whole tribes--but shamans might also assist individuals
by interpreting dreams and curing or causing outbreaks of witchcraft.
As even this brief account indicates, many key Indian religious beliefs and
practices bore broad but striking resemblances to those current among early
modern Europeans, both Catholic and Protestant. These cultures, too, credited
a creation myth (as set forth in Genesis), venerated a Creator God, dreaded
a malicious subordinate deity (Lucifer), and looked forward to the individual
soul's immortality in an afterlife superior in every respect to the here and
now. They, too, propitiated their deity with prayers and offerings and relied
upon a specially trained clergy to sustain their societies during periods of
crisis. Finally, the great majority of early modern Europeans feared witches
and pondered the meaning of their dreams.
Important as it is to appreciate the affinities between the religious cultures
of Indians and early modern Europeans (and Euro-Americans), there were real
differences that must be kept in mind. The most important is that Indians did
not distinguish between the natural and the supernatural. On the contrary,
Native Americans perceived the "material" and "spiritual" as
a unified realm of being--a kind of extended kinship network. In their view,
plants, animals and humans partook of divinity through their close connection
with "guardian spirits," a myriad of "supernatural" entities
who imbued their "natural" kin with life and power. By contrast,
Protestant and Catholic traditions were more inclined to emphasize the gulf
that separated the pure, spiritual beings in heaven--God, the angels, and saints--from
sinful men and women mired in a profane world filled with temptation and evil.
Guiding Student Discussion
When you take up Native American religion in class, you could spend hours
describing the specific beliefs and rituals of the major tribes spanning
the North American
continent, but this barrage of information might leave your students feeling
overwhelmed and confused. It might be more profitable to begin by promising
yourself to avoid any approach to Native American spirituality that is too
exhaustively detailed. Thus you might start by describing the most salient
and definitive characteristics of Indian spirituality and its most basic
similarities to and differences from Euro-American Christianity, about
which many students
may also have only the vaguest notions, so your remarks will do double duty.
If you're working with students who might find this approach too abstract,
try devoting a class period to the beliefs and practices of a single major
tribal grouping--the League of the Iroquois in upstate New York, for example,
or the Hopi in the Southwest or the Oglala Sioux in the upper Midwest (the
closer to where you're located, the better). Draw upon this specific information
to build toward more sweeping statements about the general character of Native
American religiosity. Consult these works for wonderful descriptions of Native
American religious cultures and read from the following examples.
Joel W. Martin, Sacred Revolt: The Muskogees' Struggle for a New World (Boston:
Beacon Press, 1991).
James H. Merrell, The Indians' New World: Catawbas and Their Neighbors from
European Contact through the Era of Removal (Chapel Hill: Published for the
Institute of Early American History and Culture, Williamsburg, Virginia, by
the University of North Carolina Press, 1989).
Daniel K. Richter, The Ordeal of the Longhouse (Chapel Hill: Published for
the Institute of Early American History and Culture, Williamsburg, Virginia,
by the University of North Carolina Press, 1992).
Peter Farb, Man's Rise to Civilization as Shown by the Indians of North America
from Primeval Times to the Coming of the Industrial State (New York: Dutton,
1968).
If you can find time to do more in class, your best students may be fascinated
by examples of how native peoples adapted Christianity to their particular
historical circumstances and needs. Most students tend to approach the phenomenon
of Indian "conversion" to Christianity with one of two starkly opposite
and inaccurate assumptions. While some students, typically those with strong
Christian convictions, will jump to the conclusion that Indian converts completely
abandoned native religious traditions in favor of the "superior truth" of
Christianity, others, who pride themselves on their skepticism, will voice
the suspicion that all Indian conversions were merely expedient--matters of
sheer survival--and, hence, "insincere." A brief discussion will
bring to light both of those assumptions, whereupon you will have an opportunity
to nod sagely and then say, "There's some merit in your reasoning, but
I think that this matter might be more complex." Since most bright adolescents
secretly yearn to become "complex," or at least to figure out what
that might involve, you've got them. And having got them, what you do next
is to offer some examples, as many as you can work into the time available,
of how and why native peoples selectively borrowed from Christianity, picking
and choosing certain elements of Catholic or Protestant belief and ritual which
they then combined with traditional Indian practices. Many of the books cited
in this essay describe the varying ways in which individual Native Americans
and whole tribes participated in this process.
This is how the process of "conversion" typically unfolded among
Native American peoples. Indians did not simply replace one faith with another,
nor did most converts cynically pretend to embrace Christian convictions. Instead,
native beliefs and rituals gradually became intermixed with Christian elements,
exemplifying a process known as religious syncretism--a creative combination
of the elements of different religious traditions yielding an entirely new
religious system capable of commanding broad popular loyalties. It yielded
a broad spectrum of results, ranging from native peoples' accepting almost
entirely the Christianity of the dominant white society to tribal attempts
at revitalizing traditional Indian religions and, in some instances, renewing
their resistance to Euro-American efforts at military and cultural conquest.(For
the former, see any of William McLoughlin's books on the southern Cherokee,
including The Cherokees and Christianity, 1794-1870: Essays on Acculturation
and Cultural Persistence [Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1994]).
Historians Debate
The key development in the field of Native American historiography (also
referred to as "ethnohistory") within the last twenty years
is the growing awareness of the "new world" created for both
whites and Indians as a result of their contact. Earlier histories either
celebrated the rapid triumph of Euro-American "civilization" over
Indian "savagery" or deplored the decimation of native peoples
through military defeat and disease. In both versions, native peoples figured
primarily
as passive victims. More recent histories tell another story entirely, drawing
attention to the enduring Indian resistance to white domination and, even
more important, to the multiple forms of cultural adaptation and accommodation
that
took place on both sides of the moving frontier. The landmark study of this
new scholarship is Richard White's eloquent and densely detailed The Middle
Ground:
Indians, Empires, and Republics in the Great Lakes Region (Cambridge/New
York: Cambridge University Press, 1991), which focuses on the Ohio valley
and shows
how a common cultural terrain gradually emerged as its indigenous peoples
interacted with missionaries, soldiers, traders, and other settlers, first
the French
and later the English. To get the most from this book requires several hours
of close
reading, but every learned, lucidly written page repays the effort.
If you're looking for something that is less daunting in its heft but just
as provocative, it's James Axtell's The Invasion Within: The Contest of Cultures
in Colonial North America (New York : Oxford University Press, 1985). Few historians
understand better than Axtell the importance of religion in shaping early American
history, and here he argues that the superiority of French Jesuits as missionaries
and the "limber paganism" of the Indians sustained the efforts of
both to keep the British from winning the three-way struggle for the North
American continent, a contest that culminated in the Seven Years' War (1755-1762).
The book sparkles with learning and wit, and its pages are filled with anecdotes
that will delight your students. In addition, Axtell has edited a book of primary
sources, The Indian Peoples of Eastern America: A Documentary History of the
Sexes (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981), which offers a rich array
of selections exploring every facet of life, including religion, among the
eastern Woodland tribes, as well as much helpful commentary in the introduction
and prefaces to each selection.
Christine Leigh Heyrman was a Fellow at the National Humanities Center in
1986-87. She holds a Ph.D. from Yale University in American Studies and is
currently Professor of History in the Department of History at the University
of Delaware. Dr. Heyrman is the author of Commerce and Culture: The Maritime
Communities of Colonial New England, 1690-1740 [1984], Southern Cross: The
Beginning of the Bible Belt [1997], which won the Bancroft Prize in 1998, and
Nation of Nations: A Narrative History of the Republic, with James West Davidson,
William Gienapp, Mark Lytle, and Michael Stoff [3rd ed., 1997].
|